23.2.08

Liberal Fascists!?!?!?

Speaking of popular and well done blogs, Tom Devine is a local blogging icon. One site (Mary Cary's called AboutAmherst) indicated that Devine "was blogging before the word was invented." I bet he's pissed he didn't think if it. Anyway, he is a devotee of a worldview/ philosophy called "objectivism." It's not a view I share, but it’s interesting enough.

Devine's blog (tommydevine.blogspot.com) caught my eye, not because he was running down W.E.B. Debois (that's an artifact of his "objectivism," which was championed by thinker Ann Rand - or was it Rant? he, he, he). It was Tom’s reference to a column by Tom Sowell, a Hoover Institute fellow whose columns are printed in the Springfield paper.

Sowell was flacking for an author that had written a book about what he called "liberal fascism." Obviously it’s a great title because its target market will gleefully snap it up if only for the title. In fact, it is a classic example of what philosophers call “vicious intellectualism.”

Sowell, and the book’s author are in this effort at least, political rhetoric entrepreneurs, not serious thinkers. I assume each is annoyed that conservatives get called fascists all the time and they don’t like it. Despite the fact that they both have called liberals commies, they seem eager to be able to call them “fellow travelers” of both extremes on the ideological spectrum.

Here’s the thing, though. Neither liberals nor conservatives in American politics can actually be called commies or fascists with a straight face. Both extreme ideologies deny and defame a fundamental principle that American libs and cons share and hold dear; the principle of individual rights and the fundamental sovereignty of the individual in society. Communism and Fascism are radical communitarian ideologies. They deny individual autonomy as both a social and political concept.

Therefore, Sowell and the book’s author appear to be counting on the fact that most Americans are not aware that both of our major political parties are ideologically liberal, which is to say, proponents of the notion that the best society is one in which individuals have maximum individual freedom, but limit themselves at the point where such freedom would hurt others or contribute to excessive disorder. We’re all liberals; we just have an intra-ideological disagreement about how best to achieve the goals of a liberal society.

So, calling American leftists fascists is stupid, and quite dismissive of the intelligence of one's audience. However, there may have been a valid ulterior motive for these authors. If it is an intellectual non starter for folks to call liberals fascists, it’s just as foolish to call conservatives fascists, or either of them, communists. So, while lefties like me take pleasure in revealing a weak conservative effort to further denigrate the philosophy of the American left, the logical result of this debunking is that we have equally condemned all the libs who love calling American conservatives fascists.

Son of a gun, Sowell made a positive contribution to thought today.

3 comments:

John J. Fitzgerald said...

Here is a letter to the editor that is appropriate for this issue. It deserves a wider audience. I did not write it.

From the Republican 20 February 2008

Letter to the editor

'Liberal Fascism' teaches odd lessons

On the advice of columnist Thomas Sowell (The Republican, Feb. 18) I decided to take a look at a book he recommended: "Liberal Fascism" by Jonah Goldberg. The book claims that fascists like Hitler and Mussolini were actually liberals whose policies bore a strong resemblance to those of current liberals like Hillary Clinton.

According to Goldberg (and, I guess, Sowell), free health care for citizens and pensions for retirees are actually fascist programs.

The Nazi Heinrich Himmler was an animal-rights activist who raised chickens, and Hitler was a vegetarian, which explains their liberal tendencies. "Forrest Gump" is a fascist movie, and Franklin Roosevelt's National Recovery Administration and Civilian Conservation Corps resembled Hitler Youth.

I learned that the racist eugenics movement comes from "progressives." Theodore Roosevelt, Henry Cabot Lodge, Sen. Prescott Bush (grandfather of our president) were supporters of eugenics and therefore must be liberals, along with Charles Murray of the American Enterprise Institute and author of the racist book "The Bell Curve."

I also learned that the bearded hippies and flower children of the 1960s, who demonstrated for civil rights, were quite a lot like the brownshirts and storm troopers in Nazi Germany. I learned that there were no Republican presidents in the 20th century in the U.S. (or if there were, Goldberg doesn't mention them).

Our book club is waiting eagerly for Sowell's next recommendation.

DICK BENTLEY

Amherst

Anonymous said...

Duquette - I'm a student in your PS 110 class and just wanted to drop a comment your way about a segment I recently saw on CNN Headline News. They were interviewing the author of the book, Jonah Goldberg, and I think you might be missing the point he is really trying to make. Certainly the title is a great grab from the shelf for any conservative fearmonger, but the points he makes within are basically a warning to those on both sides of the aisle that fascism is still a very potent threat. Americans today throw terms like "fascist" around at conservatives to create a culture of fear, ensuring voters stay away from far-right candidates to avoid a new American Nazi regime. The point Mr. Goldberg tries to make in his book (with an extremely well-researched and well-reasoned foundation in historical fact) is that fascism was, at the time, a very popular idea. The fascist governments of Hitler and Mussolini were founded on the basis of providing and protecting their people from all sorts of things. He then draws parallels between the policies of the afformentioned fascist regimes and the policies of the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton (he does need to appeal to his base, after all). Though he does get sensational every once in a while, this book was actually not a bad read. The important lesson is that fascism can come from either side of the aisle and will do so not by force but because of overwhelming popularity as it did in Italy and Germany.

Nocomme1 said...

Oh, and the name is Ayn (pronounced Aye-en, not Ann) Rand, not Rant. hehehe